<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076</id><updated>2011-04-21T18:35:07.739-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Shay Casey Reviews Things</title><subtitle type='html'>What, you want more?</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>43</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-111611934808675399</id><published>2005-05-14T18:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-14T18:09:08.090-07:00</updated><title type='text'>FilmFocus Reviews</title><summary type='text'>Hey, here's what I've written for FilmFocus UK over the past two months. I'm still on the staff there, but they've generally had things covered on their side of the planet for the last couple of weeks (and I've been very busy), so I haven't been called upon lately. I'll try to get an update here of what I've been seeing and what I think of it.ConstantineHostageDownfall (a.k.a. the Hitler movie)</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/111611934808675399'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/111611934808675399'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html#111611934808675399' title='FilmFocus Reviews'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-111070385323297059</id><published>2005-03-13T00:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-03-13T00:50:53.236-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Update!</title><summary type='text'>Hey dudes,So I've started writing weekly reviews for FilmFocus UK, meaning this blog hasn't been updated lately (not that it was being updated that much before, but anyway). Anyway, here are some links to what I've written there so far:Ocean's 12In Good CompanyThe Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (seriously, why don't more people like this movie?)Hide and SeekHotel RwandaHitchI swear I haven't just</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/111070385323297059'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/111070385323297059'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_archive.html#111070385323297059' title='Update!'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-110559442635853721</id><published>2005-01-15T22:39:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-01-15T22:40:05.086-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Top 10 of 2004</title><summary type='text'>Normally, I would use this space to complain about how lousy this year was and how good choices for this list were ridiculously scarce, but I can't because . . . 2004 was a good year. Really good, actually: I saw more than enough films worthy of the Top Ten, and they weren't hard to find. On with it, then:1. Kill Bill, Volume 2 (Quentin Tarantino) - I've heard the complaints: talky, rambling, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/110559442635853721'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/110559442635853721'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_archive.html#110559442635853721' title='Top 10 of 2004'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-110039708408953879</id><published>2004-11-13T16:57:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-11-13T17:51:24.090-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Don't Call It a Comeback, Part 2</title><summary type='text'>I was sitting here making a list of all the films I've still got to review on this blog. It started getting ridiculously long, and I realized that the only way to knock them out now was to provide a super-condensed comment for each. I profusely apologize for this . . .Now in alphabetical order (because I really don't remember when I saw a lot of these):Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/110039708408953879'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/110039708408953879'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_11_01_archive.html#110039708408953879' title='Don&apos;t Call It a Comeback, Part 2'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-109695404674938939</id><published>2004-10-23T20:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-10-23T20:41:25.273-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Don't Call It a Comeback</title><summary type='text'>So, life interfered at the end of this summer, and I didn't write anything for two months. Taking on a lot of commitments will do that to a fella. But I've still been seeing movies, and now it's time for me to go into recap mode:Metallica: Some Kind of Monster (Joe Berlinger &amp; Bruce Sinofsky, 2004) - The most prevalent argument I've heard against this rock doc is the old one about how rich and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/109695404674938939'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/109695404674938939'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_10_01_archive.html#109695404674938939' title='Don&apos;t Call It a Comeback'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-109151702797544447</id><published>2004-08-03T16:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-08-03T16:49:19.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Spider-Man 2 (Sam Raimi, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>I'm going to do quite a lot of complaining in this review, so let me say this first: Spider-Man 2 is a perfectly good movie. Really. It's got a lot of exciting stuff, some good performances, and an almost shockingly consistent focus on character and theme over action and plot -- shocking, that is, for a big-budget studio action flick. I'm still exceedingly happy that Sam Raimi was given the reins</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/109151702797544447'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/109151702797544447'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_archive.html#109151702797544447' title='Spider-Man 2 (Sam Raimi, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108967825879667254</id><published>2004-07-16T19:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-07-16T19:35:08.066-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Another One of Those, Y'know, Catch-ups</title><summary type='text'>Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story (Rawson Marshall Thurber, 2004) - Dodgeball is yet another example of lazy comic writing: a pretty good concept that makes use of almost none of the possibilities inherent to said concept. In other words, for a movie called Dodgeball, very little of it is actually about dodgeball. Most of the jokes are standard sexual/potty humor found in just about any other </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108967825879667254'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108967825879667254'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_archive.html#108967825879667254' title='Another One of Those, Y&apos;know, Catch-ups'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108870466263452469</id><published>2004-07-01T10:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-07-02T13:54:26.903-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Alfonso Cuaron, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban continues the ever-improving argument in favor of giving talented indie filmmakers a big-budget toy to play with. This time, the Harry Potter franchise has been turned over to Alfonso Cuaron -- known best for his low-budget Mexican hit Y Tu Mama Tambien -- and his entry into the series feels like a breath of fresh air. Chris Columbus had competently and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108870466263452469'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108870466263452469'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_archive.html#108870466263452469' title='Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Alfonso Cuaron, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108771682202925889</id><published>2004-06-20T00:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-06-20T13:09:53.516-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Day After Tomorrow (Roland Emmerich, 2004) and The Corporation (Jennifer Abbott and Mark Achbar, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>As critiques of current environmental policy go, Roland Emmerich's The Day After Tomorrow is hardly the most nuanced. Even so, it's still a little bit jolting to see this mainstream summer action flick taking obvious shots at the current administration: Emmerich includes a "President" character depicted as a slack-jawed gawker who constantly has to enter rooms and ask what everyone has been </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108771682202925889'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108771682202925889'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_06_01_archive.html#108771682202925889' title='The Day After Tomorrow (Roland Emmerich, 2004) and The Corporation (Jennifer Abbott and Mark Achbar, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108706604186150848</id><published>2004-06-12T11:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-06-13T11:32:10.103-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Shrek 2 (Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury, and Conrad Vernon, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>Hands up, all those who remain baffled at the immense success of the first Shrek film . . . okay, probably not that many hands up right now, but there must be at least a few who, like me, saw Dreamworks' Shrek as an entertaining-but-disposable film saddled with an inflated notion of its own greatness. There was a certain hypocritical smugness to the Dreamworks method -- lambasting fairy tales as </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108706604186150848'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108706604186150848'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_06_01_archive.html#108706604186150848' title='Shrek 2 (Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury, and Conrad Vernon, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108587463621515937</id><published>2004-05-29T15:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-05-30T13:20:15.606-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Big Catch-Up Post: Take It, It's YOURS!</title><summary type='text'>Okay, so here's . . . everything:Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter . . . and Spring (Kim Ki-duk, 2003) - For a while now, I've been struggling with my dissatisfaction with Kim Ki-duk's Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter . . . and Spring. It's the sort of film I should like: Asian philosophy, lush cinematography, good performances, and so forth. For some reason, though, all that didn't keep me from finding</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108587463621515937'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108587463621515937'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_05_01_archive.html#108587463621515937' title='The Big Catch-Up Post: Take It, It&apos;s YOURS!'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108469081760962278</id><published>2004-05-15T23:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-05-16T18:17:27.343-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Where the Hell Have I Been?</title><summary type='text'>Being busy, being sick, being lazy -- all these things contributed to a long neglect of this journal. I had wanted to write longer reviews of some of these films, but as I saw several of them about a month ago, I can't really do that now. So here's another one of those, you know, Dreaded Capsule Posts.Dogville (Lars Von Trier, 2004) - What was it Mr. Burns said about Marge Simpson's painting? "</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108469081760962278'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108469081760962278'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_05_01_archive.html#108469081760962278' title='Where the Hell Have I Been?'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108259909413924883</id><published>2004-04-21T18:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-04-23T19:58:39.296-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Catching Up</title><summary type='text'>Okay, here's another one of those, you know, catch-up posts. Sorry, but I just wanna get to some of the more interesting stuff I've seen in the last month.The Ladykillers (Joel &amp; Ethan Coen, 2004) - You know all those things people criticize the Coen Brothers for? Arch dialogue, unsympathetic characters, nasty stereotypes, etc.? In The Ladykillers, I can finally see them -- or rather, they </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108259909413924883'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108259909413924883'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_archive.html#108259909413924883' title='Catching Up'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108223294494216176</id><published>2004-04-17T13:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-04-17T13:19:45.903-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Walking Tall (Kevin Bray, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>Walking Tall is a remake of a previous film of the same name, but it's more accurate to call it a remake of every vigilante-justice film ever made. I don't think there's a single element that wasn't lifted from some other movie: the loner returning home, the bad guys making false overtures of kindness, the ludicrous courtroom scenes, the attempt to justify the protagonist behaving like a wrecking</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108223294494216176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108223294494216176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_archive.html#108223294494216176' title='Walking Tall (Kevin Bray, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108166568585623904</id><published>2004-04-10T23:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-04-11T00:34:56.043-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Michel Gondry, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>Going into Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, I was working on the theory that Spike Jonze may be the only director able to properly visualize a Charlie Kaufman script. After all, on the "good" side of Kaufman movies, I had Being John Malkovich and Adaptation (both directed by Jonze), and on the "bad/mediocre" side, I had Human Nature (directed by Michel Gondry) and Confessions of a Dangerous</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108166568585623904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108166568585623904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_archive.html#108166568585623904' title='Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Michel Gondry, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108097541921791653</id><published>2004-04-02T22:56:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-04-03T17:35:42.686-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Passion of the Christ (Mel Gibson, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>What more is there to say? If you dare, wade into the Passion of the Christ discussions over at the Cinemarati roundtable -- it's all been said there. But since I promised myself I'd say something about every new film I see on this blog, here are my two cents:I'm willing to give Mel Gibson the benefit of the doubt and believe that he's doing something for the sake of honest personal expression </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108097541921791653'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108097541921791653'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_archive.html#108097541921791653' title='The Passion of the Christ (Mel Gibson, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-108045066941583750</id><published>2004-03-27T21:11:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-03-28T10:48:15.623-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Spartan (David Mamet, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>In David Mamet's State and Main, there's a scene in which Alec Baldwin exits a car he has just crashed into a lamppost and remarks, "So, that happened." With that line, Mamet had, unwittingly or not, encapsulated his entire approach to filmmaking. Spartan, his latest effort, continues in the bare-bones Mamet tradition: the President's daughter has disappeared, apparently kidnapped, and those </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108045066941583750'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/108045066941583750'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_archive.html#108045066941583750' title='Spartan (David Mamet, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107983197230192671</id><published>2004-03-20T17:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-03-21T01:33:08.186-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Starsky &amp; Hutch (Todd Phillips, 2004)</title><summary type='text'>I'm not even rating it that highly, and I still think I may be slightly overrating Starsky &amp; Hutch simply for being the first new film I've seen in 2004 that wasn't a chore to watch. It's not a great film, or even a very good one, but it's amiable, it's charming, and it has spirit; it's not the kind of movie you can easily hate.Sure, the film repeats its "Weren't the 70's funny?" jokes long </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107983197230192671'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107983197230192671'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_archive.html#107983197230192671' title='Starsky &amp; Hutch (Todd Phillips, 2004)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107856611140331170</id><published>2004-03-06T01:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-03-07T17:39:26.403-08:00</updated><title type='text'>New Films of 2004!</title><summary type='text'>That's right, for the first time . . . films of 2004 reviewed here. And it only took me until March to do it. Perhaps the reason for this delay is that most of these films suck. A warning: I'll be calling the writers out quite a lot here, and though I realize that meddling producers, directors, actors, and the like could be responsible for the script problems, I've got to blame someone, you know?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107856611140331170'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107856611140331170'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_archive.html#107856611140331170' title='New Films of 2004!'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107700225600508127</id><published>2004-02-16T23:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-02-17T15:23:18.983-08:00</updated><title type='text'>More Catch-Up 2003 (yes, again)</title><summary type='text'>I know, I promised the previous catch-up was the last catch-up, but well, I don't live in New York, so sometimes 2003 stuff comes here (San Francisco) a ways into 2004. I'm sure the longer reviews will start up again soon, but for now, I'll keep doing this.The Company (Robert Altman, 2003) - Those who prefer some kind of adherence to the Aristotelian unities in their film scripts probably won't</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107700225600508127'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107700225600508127'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_archive.html#107700225600508127' title='More Catch-Up 2003 (yes, again)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107603150711728832</id><published>2004-02-05T17:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-02-06T20:05:37.903-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Top Ten of 2003</title><summary type='text'>Well, I figure it's time I finally nail this thing down (though regular Cinemarati roundtable readers will already know the makeup of this list, since it hasn't changed). Comments on the year? Around mid-year I was thinking 2003 was going to wind up as the worst one for cinema in the last ten years by a longshot, and it did, just not by the longshot I expected. The biggest problem is not a lack </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107603150711728832'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107603150711728832'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_archive.html#107603150711728832' title='Top Ten of 2003'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107552577322415895</id><published>2004-01-30T21:09:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-02-01T00:50:01.543-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Final Catch-Up Article, I Promise (2003)</title><summary type='text'>Freaky Friday (Mark S. Waters, 2003) - First off, let's get it out of the way that the whole "Chinese restaurant" business with the "magic fortune cookie" curse with "Asian voodoo" is really fucking stupid. I mean, Jesus, dudes, are we still peddling this old stereotype in the year 2003? Come up with some better writers, etc. Anyway, that off my chest, I can also say that despite the lame/racist </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107552577322415895'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107552577322415895'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html#107552577322415895' title='Final Catch-Up Article, I Promise (2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107396942147870828</id><published>2004-01-12T20:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-01-18T01:58:06.043-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Annual End-of-Year Movie Blitz, Part 2</title><summary type='text'>The Triplets of Belleville (Sylvain Chomet, 2003) - I'll say this for it -- The Triplets of Belleville is easily the most aggressively weird film I've seen all year. And while the visuals sometimes tend towards the overly-grotesque, the humorous invention and quality animation generally make up for any such problems. Major props to the music (including the terrific theme song, "Swinging </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107396942147870828'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107396942147870828'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html#107396942147870828' title='Annual End-of-Year Movie Blitz, Part 2'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107303545410302975</id><published>2004-01-02T01:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-01-02T01:33:21.130-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Annual End-of-Year Movie Blitz, Part 1</title><summary type='text'>'Tis the season to play catch-up with everything I've been seeing in late December/early January, from the glut of Oscar hopefuls to stuff I missed earlier and want to see before the Cinemarati awards deadline. Though I'd love to write about some of these films at length, I'm afraid there just isn't time -- if I waited to do so, I'd end up forgetting about what I'd seen. As you may have guessed </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107303545410302975'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107303545410302975'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html#107303545410302975' title='Annual End-of-Year Movie Blitz, Part 1'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107128640641782024</id><published>2003-12-12T19:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-12-13T01:45:57.943-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Elephant (Gus Van Sant, 2003) and The Last Samurai (Edward Zwick, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>Last week, I saw Gus Van Sant's Elephant, a film that almost seems to defy analysis. Van Sant's method, as with his previous film, Gerry, strives for something as close to utter objectivity as you can get in a fictional narrative film. He follows several groups and individuals at a high school on the morning before a shooting not unlike the one at Columbine five years ago. His camera follows each</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107128640641782024'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107128640641782024'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html#107128640641782024' title='Elephant (Gus Van Sant, 2003) and The Last Samurai (Edward Zwick, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-107120305282338685</id><published>2003-12-11T20:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-12-11T20:26:09.373-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Missing (Ron Howard, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>Upon viewing the trailer for The Missing, I had the immediate urge to remark, "So, it's The Searchers by Ron Howard." (I restrained myself, however, as I'd already made snide remarks about most of the ads that preceded the trailers that preceded the film, and figured enough snideness was enough.) The film did little to wash away that impression; it's about the search for a kidnapped daughter, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107120305282338685'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/107120305282338685'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html#107120305282338685' title='The Missing (Ron Howard, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106992607285038232</id><published>2003-11-27T01:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-27T01:49:06.590-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Several short reviews</title><summary type='text'>I've been getting behind on these things, so rather than put myself through the angst of trying to write longer reviews of each of them (augmented by the whole Thanksgiving thing), here are some quick takes of what I've seen recently. Just don't expect plot summaries.The Station Agent (Thomas McCarthy, 2003) - A good film, with some terrific performances (Peter Dinklage holding down the lead, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106992607285038232'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106992607285038232'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106992607285038232' title='Several short reviews'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106939748828160068</id><published>2003-11-20T22:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-20T22:51:35.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Mystic River (Clint Eastwood, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>Um, well, argh. I don't think much of this movie. I don't mean I dislike it. I mean it did little for me one way or the other. Director Clint Eastwood seems to consider this story something great, tragic, operatic, Shakespearean, etc., but I couldn't help but feel that the rather pulpy plot might've benefited from a more, well, pulp aesthetic. All those soaring crane shots and Big Emotional </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106939748828160068'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106939748828160068'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106939748828160068' title='Mystic River (Clint Eastwood, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106870720395179361</id><published>2003-11-12T23:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T23:09:23.773-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Matrix Revolutions (The Wachowski Brothers, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>The most disappointing thing about The Matrix Revolutions is not that it fails to keep up the genre-bending friskiness of the original The Matrix, nor that it fails to continue the philosophical rambling of The Matrix Reloaded. The most disappointing thing is that it's barely recognizable as a Matrix film at all. Revolutions, for a good portion of its running time, looks like it could be almost </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106870720395179361'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106870720395179361'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106870720395179361' title='The Matrix Revolutions (The Wachowski Brothers, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106870384821069516</id><published>2003-11-12T22:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T22:10:53.473-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Bubba Ho-tep (Don Coscarelli, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>Bubba Ho-tep is the kind of film that should be made on a big budget, but it's also, obviously, the kind of film that would never be given a big budget. Let's see: Elvis (or at least a guy who claims to be Elvis) is living in an old folks' home in the South, his best friend is a black man who believes he's JFK, and their home is being attacked by a mummy. Naturally, the mummy is a big deal to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106870384821069516'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106870384821069516'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106870384821069516' title='Bubba Ho-tep (Don Coscarelli, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106809199411640546</id><published>2003-11-05T20:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-05T20:23:12.423-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Kill Bill, Volume 1 (Quentin Tarantino, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>I've been reluctant to write a review of this film for two reasons: (1) It's not finished, and (2) there's so much going on in it, in terms of the little referential details and chronological shifting, that I felt a second viewing was demanded before I could write about it. Well, I've seen it again, and I'm still having trouble coming up with something to say. So, I figure, to heck with the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106809199411640546'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106809199411640546'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106809199411640546' title='Kill Bill, Volume 1 (Quentin Tarantino, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106715091157917345</id><published>2003-10-25T23:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-26T01:22:49.793-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Runaway Jury (Gary Fleder, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>To say that Runaway Jury is far-fetched is to say that Kill Bill is a little violent. Frankly, the entire premise of the film -- that a clandestine "company" can keep tabs on all prospective jurors for a big trial, and charge millions of dollars for their services -- is completely preposterous. Granted, this is Grisham-land, where lawyers lead more action-packed lives than Indiana Jones, and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106715091157917345'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106715091157917345'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106715091157917345' title='Runaway Jury (Gary Fleder, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106654337012926414</id><published>2003-10-18T23:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-19T21:35:30.620-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Intolerable Cruelty (Joel Coen, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>The one thing about Intolerable Cruelty that sent up warning flags in my mind came during the opening credits, and it's not the already-expected "produced by Brian Grazer" credit, as you might think -- it's when the writing credits turn up, and unlike with other Coen efforts, there are other names tossed in there along with Joel and Ethan Coen. Most tellingly, while the brothers share </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106654337012926414'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106654337012926414'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106654337012926414' title='Intolerable Cruelty (Joel Coen, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106602151000131241</id><published>2003-10-12T22:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-12T22:10:15.100-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Better Luck Tomorrow (Justin Lin, 2002)</title><summary type='text'>After watching Better Luck Tomorrow, I read that the film had actually been criticized by Asian-American groups for its negative portrayal of Asian characters. My response to that is fairly simple: What? Before we get into a discussion of whether or not the portrayal was negative, let's just pose a question: Can you name any film featuring American-born Asian characters, in all the principal </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106602151000131241'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106602151000131241'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106602151000131241' title='Better Luck Tomorrow (Justin Lin, 2002)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106568420300731771</id><published>2003-10-09T00:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-12T21:49:15.176-07:00</updated><title type='text'>School of Rock (Richard Linklater, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>Against all reason, I love Jack Black. I should hate him -- he's a ham, he's loud, he's obnoxious -- but Black does something with his overacting that resonates with conviction. The best basis for comparison I can think of is Toshiro Mifune (now, bear with me here . . .); there's very little that's natural or subtle about Mifune's samurai performances, but it doesn't matter -- every sound, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106568420300731771'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106568420300731771'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106568420300731771' title='School of Rock (Richard Linklater, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106559688336525290</id><published>2003-10-08T00:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-08T00:10:54.923-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Rundown (Peter Berg, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>It's official -- The Rock is legit. He's got prospects. He's bonafide. Obviously, he had already accomplished this in the wrestling ring, but The Rundown sees him finally prove himself as a movie star. The best thing about his performance in this film is that he's not phoning it in; you can see him making the effort to create a character, know the circumstances, and engage the audience. I'm </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106559688336525290'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106559688336525290'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106559688336525290' title='The Rundown (Peter Berg, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106543273522377689</id><published>2003-10-06T02:32:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-06T02:41:18.113-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Big O [TV Series] (Kazuyoshi Katayama, 1999)</title><summary type='text'>While catching a few episodes of this anime series on Cartoon Network, I was struck by its similarities to Batman: The Animated Series. Not only does The Big O strike a visual resemblance to Batman, it also contains characters clearly inspired by the Dark Knight's entourage: Roger Smith is the hero, a millionaire playboy who moonlights as a crimefighter (he's the "negotiator" for the city, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106543273522377689'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106543273522377689'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106543273522377689' title='The Big O [TV Series] (Kazuyoshi Katayama, 1999)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106525601608056206</id><published>2003-10-04T01:26:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-04T01:26:55.896-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Once Upon a Time in Mexico (Robert Rodriguez, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>Let's get it out of the way first: Once Upon a Time in Mexico is silly, overblown, almost entirely incomprehensible, and way too violent for its own (or anyone's) good. It's also, on some level or another, totally fucking awesome. Sure, more a series of hey-isn't-that-cool scenes strung together than an actual movie, but the difference between this and other such movies is that the scenes in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106525601608056206'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106525601608056206'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106525601608056206' title='Once Upon a Time in Mexico (Robert Rodriguez, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106506739007352513</id><published>2003-10-01T21:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-01T21:22:18.430-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Underworld (Len Wiseman, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>This should've been a whole heck of a lot better, but it falls into the same trap that a lot of genre exercises do: It's much more enamored of all the incidental cool stuff that comes with its premise (vampires vs. werewolves, in a nutshell) than it is with telling a good story. Underworld seems to assume that we already know exactly what the vampires can do, and why they're fighting werewolves, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106506739007352513'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106506739007352513'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106506739007352513' title='Underworld (Len Wiseman, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106473214221234840</id><published>2003-09-27T23:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-27T23:59:04.616-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Love Hina [TV Series] (Yoshiaki Iwasaki, 2000)</title><summary type='text'>As I understand it, the scenario put forth in Love Hina is a fairly common one in anime: a frustrated (both sexually and otherwise) young man is forced by circumstance to live with a bunch of beautiful young women. In this case, it's Keitaro, frustrated by his failure to get into the prestigious Tokyo University, somehow roped into becoming the manager of a girls' dormitory when his grandmother </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106473214221234840'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106473214221234840'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106473214221234840' title='Love Hina [TV Series] (Yoshiaki Iwasaki, 2000)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106472549897199191</id><published>2003-09-27T22:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-04-24T18:18:13.840-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Archive</title><summary type='text'>Before this thing gets too unwieldy, I'm going to start an archive page right here, for handy cataloguing needs. Reviews will be listed alphabetially by title, and this post will be linked to on the sidebar.2004Along Came PollyThe Big BounceThe Butterfly EffectEternal Sunshine of the Spotless MindEurotripHellboyJersey GirlThe LadykillersMiracleThe Passion of the ChristScooby-Doo 2: </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106472549897199191'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106472549897199191'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106472549897199191' title='Archive'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106463644133795796</id><published>2003-09-26T21:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-26T22:44:12.753-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Lost in Translation (Sofia Coppola, 2003)</title><summary type='text'>The problem with Lost in Translation is that it's going to be very hard to explain to someone who doesn't like it exactly what the appeal of the film is. What can you say, really? There's not a whole heck of a lot of intellectual work to be done in unpacking or deconstructing the film -- it asks you to accept it purely on an emotional level, to drink in the mood, atmosphere, and humanity of it </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106463644133795796'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106463644133795796'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106463644133795796' title='Lost in Translation (Sofia Coppola, 2003)'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5866076.post-106463264441901950</id><published>2003-09-26T20:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-26T20:23:40.510-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Here we go, Joe</title><summary type='text'>Well, what the hell, time to get started. Hopefully, this will lead to me posting all sorts of very interesting reviews of all the films I see. I say, hopefully.I'm Shay Casey, and you may know me from the Cinemarati, or from Daily-Reviews.com. You also may not know me, but that's okay -- I won't hold it against you.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106463264441901950'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5866076/posts/default/106463264441901950'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://sycasey.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106463264441901950' title='Here we go, Joe'/><author><name>Shay</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10572269101009102084</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
